Name: Jane Thompson AKA Gordon
Arrested for: Thief
Arrested at: North Shields Police Station
Arrested on: 13th July 1904 Tyne and Wear Archives
ref: DX1388-1-35-Jane Thompson AKA Gordon
These images are a selection from an album of photographs of prisoners brought before the North Shields Police Court between 1902 and 1916 in the collection of Tyne & Wear Archives (TWA ref DX1388/1). Image available on Flickr.
I thought it appropriate to start this post off with a vintage mug shot from 1904. This poor lady, I have no idea if she was actually found guilty. So if any of her descendants come across this picture, my apologies.
A distant cousin of mine recently confided in me that it had been brought to her attention that her pictures were being saved from her tree on ancestry.com to a certain person’s (thief) personal computer and then uploaded to that certain person’s (thief) ancestry.com tree as though the picture had generated from them(thief) in the first place. She went to this certain person’s (thief) tree and counted no less that 96 of her pictures being done this way.
She (my cousin) wanted my opinion on how she should handle the situation and what I felt was the appropriate way to save photos. It’s my opinion, if someone (my cousin) was kind enough to upload the picture in the first place to share, then the certain person (thief) that saved the picture to their computer, should have appropriately attached the original picture from her (cousin) tree to theirs (thief), and then saved it. Leaving the link to the original picture.
I wonder if this certain person (thief) realizes that when you save a picture from someone’s tree – it tells them (my cousin). Then when the certain person (thief) uploads the pictures to their tree, it sends the person that originally had the picture (my cousin) a shaky leaf, indicating a new picture has been found! Really?? New?? Not so much…..
She emailed the certain person (thief), and got no response. So she contacted Ancestry, and this was there response.
Thank you for your response. We appreciate your feedback and are committed to providing excellent customer service.
The following excerpt from our Community Guidelines within our Terms and Conditions is in reference to the agreement between the submitter of content and Ancestry.com:
Shortly after this, the certain person (no longer a thief) did delete the pictures from their tree.
People, even though that is the policy of Ancestry, please be considerate of the source of the photos you are saving. It’s ok to save them. Just make sure if you are going to add them to your tree, give credit where credit is due. You may be causing them to lose contact with another potential cousin. Why not leave it on their tree, attach it to your tree, and then you both can have contact with the potential cousin.
Am I the only one that feels this way?? Please give me feedback on this, I would really like to hear some opinions on the matter.
In the meantime, after I get some health issues taken care of for my parents, I’m going to go back through my tree and make sure I have properly credited all my pictures to the person I scanned them from. It’s possible as a newbie, I wasn’t so good at that. I do know however, exactly who gave me what photo. I kept very good records of that. So many of the pictures I have, cousins let me scan and some are pictures I took, of pictures hanging on people’s walls, so I will know if those came from me, because no else has had access to those. I’m curious to know if this has happened to any of my pictures.
Which brings another thought to mind, does anyone know how to properly Cite a scanned copy of a photo in Family Tree Maker??
Oh, and Jane Thompson aka Gordon, I am truly sorry to drag you into this matter. I just thought it would be a really cool way to show people your awesome mug shot from over a hundred years ago, and I hope you weren’t found guilty and thrown in prison, and please note, I properly credited your picture. Thank you, thank you very much.